A comparative study of two various empirical methodologies for deriving kinetics of methane/steam reforming reaction

A. Sciazko, Y. Komatsu, N. Washio, G. Brus, S. Kimijima, J. S. Szmyd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

Despite methane/steam reforming is the conventional method for hydrogen production, there are widespread disagreements between formulations of the process kinetic derived in the literature. In the present research, the mathematical baseline of the classical calculation methodologies of the reaction kinetic are presented and compared. They include methodologies based on: I) the assumed constant partial pressure of steam and methane and II) the minimization of the summed relative standard deviation of the calculated reaction constant. Their results are compared with generalized least squares approach. The calculation methodologies are correlated with the planed experimental measurement set. This paper aims for the clarification of the observed differences and pointing the most suitable methodology for the decreasing the overall uncertainty of the model.

LanguageEnglish
Article number032026
JournalJournal of Physics: Conference Series
Volume745
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016 Oct 21

Fingerprint

steam
methane
methodology
kinetics
hydrogen production
partial pressure
standard deviation
reaction kinetics
formulations
optimization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

A comparative study of two various empirical methodologies for deriving kinetics of methane/steam reforming reaction. / Sciazko, A.; Komatsu, Y.; Washio, N.; Brus, G.; Kimijima, S.; Szmyd, J. S.

In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 745, No. 3, 032026, 21.10.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c18f434bf95b4ce08998e32ac00b709c,
title = "A comparative study of two various empirical methodologies for deriving kinetics of methane/steam reforming reaction",
abstract = "Despite methane/steam reforming is the conventional method for hydrogen production, there are widespread disagreements between formulations of the process kinetic derived in the literature. In the present research, the mathematical baseline of the classical calculation methodologies of the reaction kinetic are presented and compared. They include methodologies based on: I) the assumed constant partial pressure of steam and methane and II) the minimization of the summed relative standard deviation of the calculated reaction constant. Their results are compared with generalized least squares approach. The calculation methodologies are correlated with the planed experimental measurement set. This paper aims for the clarification of the observed differences and pointing the most suitable methodology for the decreasing the overall uncertainty of the model.",
author = "A. Sciazko and Y. Komatsu and N. Washio and G. Brus and S. Kimijima and Szmyd, {J. S.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1088/1742-6596/745/3/032026",
language = "English",
volume = "745",
journal = "Journal of Physics: Conference Series",
issn = "1742-6588",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of two various empirical methodologies for deriving kinetics of methane/steam reforming reaction

AU - Sciazko,A.

AU - Komatsu,Y.

AU - Washio,N.

AU - Brus,G.

AU - Kimijima,S.

AU - Szmyd,J. S.

PY - 2016/10/21

Y1 - 2016/10/21

N2 - Despite methane/steam reforming is the conventional method for hydrogen production, there are widespread disagreements between formulations of the process kinetic derived in the literature. In the present research, the mathematical baseline of the classical calculation methodologies of the reaction kinetic are presented and compared. They include methodologies based on: I) the assumed constant partial pressure of steam and methane and II) the minimization of the summed relative standard deviation of the calculated reaction constant. Their results are compared with generalized least squares approach. The calculation methodologies are correlated with the planed experimental measurement set. This paper aims for the clarification of the observed differences and pointing the most suitable methodology for the decreasing the overall uncertainty of the model.

AB - Despite methane/steam reforming is the conventional method for hydrogen production, there are widespread disagreements between formulations of the process kinetic derived in the literature. In the present research, the mathematical baseline of the classical calculation methodologies of the reaction kinetic are presented and compared. They include methodologies based on: I) the assumed constant partial pressure of steam and methane and II) the minimization of the summed relative standard deviation of the calculated reaction constant. Their results are compared with generalized least squares approach. The calculation methodologies are correlated with the planed experimental measurement set. This paper aims for the clarification of the observed differences and pointing the most suitable methodology for the decreasing the overall uncertainty of the model.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995480031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995480031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1742-6596/745/3/032026

DO - 10.1088/1742-6596/745/3/032026

M3 - Article

VL - 745

JO - Journal of Physics: Conference Series

T2 - Journal of Physics: Conference Series

JF - Journal of Physics: Conference Series

SN - 1742-6588

IS - 3

M1 - 032026

ER -