A comparison of caching strategies for content centric networking

Cesar Bernardini, Thomas Silverston, Olivier Festor

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Content Centric Networking (CCN) is a new architecture for a future Internet. CCN relies on in-network caching capabilities of nodes and the efficiency of this architecture depends drastically on performances of caching strategies. Thus, there have been a lot of studies proposing new caching strategies to improve the performances of CCN. However, among all these strategies, it is still unclear which one performs better as there is a lack of common environment to compare these strategies. In this paper, we compare the performances of CCN caching strategies within the same simulation environment. We build a common evaluation scenario and we compare via simulation five relevant caching strategies: Leave Copy Everywhere (LCE), Leave Copy Down (LCD), ProbCache, Cache »Less» For More and MAGIC. We analyze the performances of all the strategies in terms of Cache Hit, Stretch, Diversity and Complexity, and determine the cache strategy that fits the best with every scenario.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2015
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
ISBN (Electronic)9781479959525
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes
Event58th IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2015 - San Diego, United States
Duration: 2015 Dec 62015 Dec 10

Other

Other58th IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2015
CountryUnited States
CitySan Diego
Period15/12/615/12/10

Fingerprint

networking
Internet
performance
scenario
simulation
efficiency
lack
evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Communication

Cite this

Bernardini, C., Silverston, T., & Festor, O. (2015). A comparison of caching strategies for content centric networking. In 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2015 [7417007] Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2014.7417007

A comparison of caching strategies for content centric networking. / Bernardini, Cesar; Silverston, Thomas; Festor, Olivier.

2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2015. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2015. 7417007.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Bernardini, C, Silverston, T & Festor, O 2015, A comparison of caching strategies for content centric networking. in 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2015., 7417007, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 58th IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2015, San Diego, United States, 15/12/6. https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2014.7417007
Bernardini C, Silverston T, Festor O. A comparison of caching strategies for content centric networking. In 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2015. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2015. 7417007 https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2014.7417007
Bernardini, Cesar ; Silverston, Thomas ; Festor, Olivier. / A comparison of caching strategies for content centric networking. 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2015. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2015.
@inproceedings{9561603a08cb42e39d06738dd9d5c631,
title = "A comparison of caching strategies for content centric networking",
abstract = "Content Centric Networking (CCN) is a new architecture for a future Internet. CCN relies on in-network caching capabilities of nodes and the efficiency of this architecture depends drastically on performances of caching strategies. Thus, there have been a lot of studies proposing new caching strategies to improve the performances of CCN. However, among all these strategies, it is still unclear which one performs better as there is a lack of common environment to compare these strategies. In this paper, we compare the performances of CCN caching strategies within the same simulation environment. We build a common evaluation scenario and we compare via simulation five relevant caching strategies: Leave Copy Everywhere (LCE), Leave Copy Down (LCD), ProbCache, Cache »Less» For More and MAGIC. We analyze the performances of all the strategies in terms of Cache Hit, Stretch, Diversity and Complexity, and determine the cache strategy that fits the best with every scenario.",
author = "Cesar Bernardini and Thomas Silverston and Olivier Festor",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/GLOCOM.2014.7417007",
language = "English",
booktitle = "2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2015",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
address = "United States",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A comparison of caching strategies for content centric networking

AU - Bernardini, Cesar

AU - Silverston, Thomas

AU - Festor, Olivier

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Content Centric Networking (CCN) is a new architecture for a future Internet. CCN relies on in-network caching capabilities of nodes and the efficiency of this architecture depends drastically on performances of caching strategies. Thus, there have been a lot of studies proposing new caching strategies to improve the performances of CCN. However, among all these strategies, it is still unclear which one performs better as there is a lack of common environment to compare these strategies. In this paper, we compare the performances of CCN caching strategies within the same simulation environment. We build a common evaluation scenario and we compare via simulation five relevant caching strategies: Leave Copy Everywhere (LCE), Leave Copy Down (LCD), ProbCache, Cache »Less» For More and MAGIC. We analyze the performances of all the strategies in terms of Cache Hit, Stretch, Diversity and Complexity, and determine the cache strategy that fits the best with every scenario.

AB - Content Centric Networking (CCN) is a new architecture for a future Internet. CCN relies on in-network caching capabilities of nodes and the efficiency of this architecture depends drastically on performances of caching strategies. Thus, there have been a lot of studies proposing new caching strategies to improve the performances of CCN. However, among all these strategies, it is still unclear which one performs better as there is a lack of common environment to compare these strategies. In this paper, we compare the performances of CCN caching strategies within the same simulation environment. We build a common evaluation scenario and we compare via simulation five relevant caching strategies: Leave Copy Everywhere (LCE), Leave Copy Down (LCD), ProbCache, Cache »Less» For More and MAGIC. We analyze the performances of all the strategies in terms of Cache Hit, Stretch, Diversity and Complexity, and determine the cache strategy that fits the best with every scenario.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964889382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964889382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/GLOCOM.2014.7417007

DO - 10.1109/GLOCOM.2014.7417007

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2015

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

ER -