A quantitative reanalysis of data on the structure of L1 and L2 language ability in multitrait-multimethod studies

Yo In'nami, Rie Koizumi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To gain a better understanding of the structure of L1 and L2 language ability, we conducted an extensive literature search to collect multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) studies. We specifically examined the unitary, correlated, uncorrelated, and higher-order structures of language ability to determine which of these best fit the data across studies. We used confirmatory factor analysis to reanalyze 58 correlation or covariance matrices from 39 studies, among which we retained 17 correlation or covariance matrices from 14 studies for the main analysis. Empirical evidence showed that the unitary and higher-order models best defined both L1 and L2 ability. The support for the unitary model was surprising but consistent with the findings of Davidson (1988). Moderator variable analyses failed to identify clear relationships between the examined models and moderator variables.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)214-265
Number of pages52
JournalAsian EFL Journal
Volume14
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

moderator
ability
language
factor analysis
evidence
Language
Reanalysis
literature
Empirical Evidence
Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Keywords

  • Confirmatory factor analysis
  • First language
  • Language ability structure
  • Multitrait-multimethod
  • Second language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

A quantitative reanalysis of data on the structure of L1 and L2 language ability in multitrait-multimethod studies. / In'nami, Yo; Koizumi, Rie.

In: Asian EFL Journal, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2012, p. 214-265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1c1fb4c639dc46f9914974921e5b209f,
title = "A quantitative reanalysis of data on the structure of L1 and L2 language ability in multitrait-multimethod studies",
abstract = "To gain a better understanding of the structure of L1 and L2 language ability, we conducted an extensive literature search to collect multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) studies. We specifically examined the unitary, correlated, uncorrelated, and higher-order structures of language ability to determine which of these best fit the data across studies. We used confirmatory factor analysis to reanalyze 58 correlation or covariance matrices from 39 studies, among which we retained 17 correlation or covariance matrices from 14 studies for the main analysis. Empirical evidence showed that the unitary and higher-order models best defined both L1 and L2 ability. The support for the unitary model was surprising but consistent with the findings of Davidson (1988). Moderator variable analyses failed to identify clear relationships between the examined models and moderator variables.",
keywords = "Confirmatory factor analysis, First language, Language ability structure, Multitrait-multimethod, Second language",
author = "Yo In'nami and Rie Koizumi",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "214--265",
journal = "Asian EFL Journal",
issn = "1738-1460",
publisher = "Asian EFL Journal Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A quantitative reanalysis of data on the structure of L1 and L2 language ability in multitrait-multimethod studies

AU - In'nami, Yo

AU - Koizumi, Rie

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - To gain a better understanding of the structure of L1 and L2 language ability, we conducted an extensive literature search to collect multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) studies. We specifically examined the unitary, correlated, uncorrelated, and higher-order structures of language ability to determine which of these best fit the data across studies. We used confirmatory factor analysis to reanalyze 58 correlation or covariance matrices from 39 studies, among which we retained 17 correlation or covariance matrices from 14 studies for the main analysis. Empirical evidence showed that the unitary and higher-order models best defined both L1 and L2 ability. The support for the unitary model was surprising but consistent with the findings of Davidson (1988). Moderator variable analyses failed to identify clear relationships between the examined models and moderator variables.

AB - To gain a better understanding of the structure of L1 and L2 language ability, we conducted an extensive literature search to collect multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) studies. We specifically examined the unitary, correlated, uncorrelated, and higher-order structures of language ability to determine which of these best fit the data across studies. We used confirmatory factor analysis to reanalyze 58 correlation or covariance matrices from 39 studies, among which we retained 17 correlation or covariance matrices from 14 studies for the main analysis. Empirical evidence showed that the unitary and higher-order models best defined both L1 and L2 ability. The support for the unitary model was surprising but consistent with the findings of Davidson (1988). Moderator variable analyses failed to identify clear relationships between the examined models and moderator variables.

KW - Confirmatory factor analysis

KW - First language

KW - Language ability structure

KW - Multitrait-multimethod

KW - Second language

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904738518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904738518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 214

EP - 265

JO - Asian EFL Journal

JF - Asian EFL Journal

SN - 1738-1460

IS - 3

ER -