Comparison of Magnetizing Characteristics of Superconducting Bulk Magnet Cooled by Stirling and GM Refrigerators During Pulsed Field Magnetization

Kazuya Yokoyama, Atsushi Katsuki, Atsuro Miura, Tetsuo Oka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We developed several type superconducting bulk magnets with the goal of their industrial application, and study to improve a magnetic field by pulsed field magnetization. It is important to select a suitable refrigerator to cool a bulk superconductor. This paper investigates magnetizing characteristics when using different refrigerators. One is a Stirling refrigerator, in which an ultimate temperature was up to 50 K and cooling capacity was 11 W at 77 K. Another is a dual-stage GM refrigerator with an air-cooled compressor, in which an ultimate temperature was 13 K and cooling capacity was 5 W at 20 K. The other is a dual-stage GM refrigerator with a water-cooled compressor, in which an ultimate temperature was 12 K and cooling capacity was 12 W at 20 K. When a GdBCO bulk with dimensions of 60 mm in diameter and 20 mm thick was cooled by the Stirling refrigerator, the lowest temperature was approximately 55 K. Then, in the other refrigerators, the temperature was adjusted to the same value by a temperature regulator. The bulk was cooled by each refrigerator and a single pulsed field was applied while varying the amplitude of 3.1 to 7.0 T. During magnetization, time variations of magnetic flux density on the bulk surface were monitored. After magnetization, the trapped field distributions were measured on the magnetic pole surface. These data show that even the bulk magnet using the Stirling refrigerator with relatively low cooling ability could trap a high magnetic field. Consequently, the bulk magnet with high cooling capacity could not necessarily generate a high magnetic field.

Original languageEnglish
Article number8253890
JournalIEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jun 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Refrigerators
refrigerators
Magnets
Magnetization
magnets
magnetization
Cooling
cooling
compressors
Magnetic fields
Temperature
Compressors
temperature
magnetic fields
magnetic poles
regulators
Magnetic flux
Superconducting materials
Industrial applications
magnetic flux

Keywords

  • cooling capacity
  • magnetic flux density
  • pulsed field magnetization
  • refrigerator
  • Superconducting bulk magnet

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Comparison of Magnetizing Characteristics of Superconducting Bulk Magnet Cooled by Stirling and GM Refrigerators During Pulsed Field Magnetization. / Yokoyama, Kazuya; Katsuki, Atsushi; Miura, Atsuro; Oka, Tetsuo.

In: IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 28, No. 4, 8253890, 01.06.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{478aa3b6efe04724814fe26d273dfa11,
title = "Comparison of Magnetizing Characteristics of Superconducting Bulk Magnet Cooled by Stirling and GM Refrigerators During Pulsed Field Magnetization",
abstract = "We developed several type superconducting bulk magnets with the goal of their industrial application, and study to improve a magnetic field by pulsed field magnetization. It is important to select a suitable refrigerator to cool a bulk superconductor. This paper investigates magnetizing characteristics when using different refrigerators. One is a Stirling refrigerator, in which an ultimate temperature was up to 50 K and cooling capacity was 11 W at 77 K. Another is a dual-stage GM refrigerator with an air-cooled compressor, in which an ultimate temperature was 13 K and cooling capacity was 5 W at 20 K. The other is a dual-stage GM refrigerator with a water-cooled compressor, in which an ultimate temperature was 12 K and cooling capacity was 12 W at 20 K. When a GdBCO bulk with dimensions of 60 mm in diameter and 20 mm thick was cooled by the Stirling refrigerator, the lowest temperature was approximately 55 K. Then, in the other refrigerators, the temperature was adjusted to the same value by a temperature regulator. The bulk was cooled by each refrigerator and a single pulsed field was applied while varying the amplitude of 3.1 to 7.0 T. During magnetization, time variations of magnetic flux density on the bulk surface were monitored. After magnetization, the trapped field distributions were measured on the magnetic pole surface. These data show that even the bulk magnet using the Stirling refrigerator with relatively low cooling ability could trap a high magnetic field. Consequently, the bulk magnet with high cooling capacity could not necessarily generate a high magnetic field.",
keywords = "cooling capacity, magnetic flux density, pulsed field magnetization, refrigerator, Superconducting bulk magnet",
author = "Kazuya Yokoyama and Atsushi Katsuki and Atsuro Miura and Tetsuo Oka",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/TASC.2018.2791993",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity",
issn = "1051-8223",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Magnetizing Characteristics of Superconducting Bulk Magnet Cooled by Stirling and GM Refrigerators During Pulsed Field Magnetization

AU - Yokoyama, Kazuya

AU - Katsuki, Atsushi

AU - Miura, Atsuro

AU - Oka, Tetsuo

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - We developed several type superconducting bulk magnets with the goal of their industrial application, and study to improve a magnetic field by pulsed field magnetization. It is important to select a suitable refrigerator to cool a bulk superconductor. This paper investigates magnetizing characteristics when using different refrigerators. One is a Stirling refrigerator, in which an ultimate temperature was up to 50 K and cooling capacity was 11 W at 77 K. Another is a dual-stage GM refrigerator with an air-cooled compressor, in which an ultimate temperature was 13 K and cooling capacity was 5 W at 20 K. The other is a dual-stage GM refrigerator with a water-cooled compressor, in which an ultimate temperature was 12 K and cooling capacity was 12 W at 20 K. When a GdBCO bulk with dimensions of 60 mm in diameter and 20 mm thick was cooled by the Stirling refrigerator, the lowest temperature was approximately 55 K. Then, in the other refrigerators, the temperature was adjusted to the same value by a temperature regulator. The bulk was cooled by each refrigerator and a single pulsed field was applied while varying the amplitude of 3.1 to 7.0 T. During magnetization, time variations of magnetic flux density on the bulk surface were monitored. After magnetization, the trapped field distributions were measured on the magnetic pole surface. These data show that even the bulk magnet using the Stirling refrigerator with relatively low cooling ability could trap a high magnetic field. Consequently, the bulk magnet with high cooling capacity could not necessarily generate a high magnetic field.

AB - We developed several type superconducting bulk magnets with the goal of their industrial application, and study to improve a magnetic field by pulsed field magnetization. It is important to select a suitable refrigerator to cool a bulk superconductor. This paper investigates magnetizing characteristics when using different refrigerators. One is a Stirling refrigerator, in which an ultimate temperature was up to 50 K and cooling capacity was 11 W at 77 K. Another is a dual-stage GM refrigerator with an air-cooled compressor, in which an ultimate temperature was 13 K and cooling capacity was 5 W at 20 K. The other is a dual-stage GM refrigerator with a water-cooled compressor, in which an ultimate temperature was 12 K and cooling capacity was 12 W at 20 K. When a GdBCO bulk with dimensions of 60 mm in diameter and 20 mm thick was cooled by the Stirling refrigerator, the lowest temperature was approximately 55 K. Then, in the other refrigerators, the temperature was adjusted to the same value by a temperature regulator. The bulk was cooled by each refrigerator and a single pulsed field was applied while varying the amplitude of 3.1 to 7.0 T. During magnetization, time variations of magnetic flux density on the bulk surface were monitored. After magnetization, the trapped field distributions were measured on the magnetic pole surface. These data show that even the bulk magnet using the Stirling refrigerator with relatively low cooling ability could trap a high magnetic field. Consequently, the bulk magnet with high cooling capacity could not necessarily generate a high magnetic field.

KW - cooling capacity

KW - magnetic flux density

KW - pulsed field magnetization

KW - refrigerator

KW - Superconducting bulk magnet

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041281696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041281696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TASC.2018.2791993

DO - 10.1109/TASC.2018.2791993

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85041281696

VL - 28

JO - IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity

JF - IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity

SN - 1051-8223

IS - 4

M1 - 8253890

ER -