Comparison of two level PWM and three level PWM in Dual Active Bridge converter

Yuki Nishiya, Nguyen Duy Dinh, Goro Fujita

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

This paper proposes a new switching method to increase the efficiency in Dual Active Bridge converter (DAB). Two level PWM is general method but the efficiency is lower than three level PWM. In this paper, three level inverter is applied in DAB and the efficiency is compared two level PWM. The power loss of MOSFET checked and the power loss with three level PWM is expected to lower loss. The dead-Time is controlled for generating three level voltage. Through a simulation and an experiment, the proposed switching method is compared the conventional switching method.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2016 IEEE International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies, ICSET 2016
PublisherIEEE Computer Society
Pages311-314
Number of pages4
ISBN (Electronic)9781509052004
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jan 9
Event4th IEEE International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies, ICSET 2016 - Hanoi, Viet Nam
Duration: 2016 Nov 142016 Nov 16

Publication series

NameIEEE International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies, ICSET
Volume0
ISSN (Print)2165-4387
ISSN (Electronic)2165-4395

Other

Other4th IEEE International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies, ICSET 2016
CountryViet Nam
CityHanoi
Period16/11/1416/11/16

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Dead-Time
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB)
  • Three level PWM

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Cite this

Nishiya, Y., Dinh, N. D., & Fujita, G. (2017). Comparison of two level PWM and three level PWM in Dual Active Bridge converter. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies, ICSET 2016 (pp. 311-314). [7811801] (IEEE International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies, ICSET; Vol. 0). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSET.2016.7811801