Differences in flood hazard projections in Europe–their causes and consequences for decision making

Z. W. Kundzewicz, V. Krysanova, R. Dankers, Yukiko Hirabayashi, S. Kanae, F. F. Hattermann, S. Huang, P. C.D. Milly, M. Stoffel, P. P.J. Driessen, P. Matczak, P. Quevauviller, H. J. Schellnhuber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper interprets differences in flood hazard projections over Europe and identifies likely sources of discrepancy. Further, it discusses potential implications of these differences for flood risk reduction and adaptation to climate change. The discrepancy in flood hazard projections raises caution, especially among decision makers in charge of water resources management, flood risk reduction, and climate change adaptation at regional to local scales. Because it is naïve to expect availability of trustworthy quantitative projections of future flood hazard, in order to reduce flood risk one should focus attention on mapping of current and future risks and vulnerability hotspots and improve the situation there. Although an intercomparison of flood hazard projections is done in this paper and differences are identified and interpreted, it does not seems possible to recommend which large-scale studies may be considered most credible in particular areas of Europe. EDITOR D. Koutsoyiannis ASSOCIATE EDITOR not assigned

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalHydrological Sciences Journal
Volume62
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jan 2
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

decision making
hazard
vulnerability
climate change
risk reduction
Europe

Keywords

  • climate change
  • decision making
  • Europe
  • flood hazard
  • projections
  • science–policy interactions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Differences in flood hazard projections in Europe–their causes and consequences for decision making. / Kundzewicz, Z. W.; Krysanova, V.; Dankers, R.; Hirabayashi, Yukiko; Kanae, S.; Hattermann, F. F.; Huang, S.; Milly, P. C.D.; Stoffel, M.; Driessen, P. P.J.; Matczak, P.; Quevauviller, P.; Schellnhuber, H. J.

In: Hydrological Sciences Journal, Vol. 62, No. 1, 02.01.2017, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kundzewicz, ZW, Krysanova, V, Dankers, R, Hirabayashi, Y, Kanae, S, Hattermann, FF, Huang, S, Milly, PCD, Stoffel, M, Driessen, PPJ, Matczak, P, Quevauviller, P & Schellnhuber, HJ 2017, 'Differences in flood hazard projections in Europe–their causes and consequences for decision making', Hydrological Sciences Journal, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1241398
Kundzewicz, Z. W. ; Krysanova, V. ; Dankers, R. ; Hirabayashi, Yukiko ; Kanae, S. ; Hattermann, F. F. ; Huang, S. ; Milly, P. C.D. ; Stoffel, M. ; Driessen, P. P.J. ; Matczak, P. ; Quevauviller, P. ; Schellnhuber, H. J. / Differences in flood hazard projections in Europe–their causes and consequences for decision making. In: Hydrological Sciences Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 62, No. 1. pp. 1-14.
@article{49a3da8dd5c3488180b240a22661cad5,
title = "Differences in flood hazard projections in Europe–their causes and consequences for decision making",
abstract = "This paper interprets differences in flood hazard projections over Europe and identifies likely sources of discrepancy. Further, it discusses potential implications of these differences for flood risk reduction and adaptation to climate change. The discrepancy in flood hazard projections raises caution, especially among decision makers in charge of water resources management, flood risk reduction, and climate change adaptation at regional to local scales. Because it is na{\"i}ve to expect availability of trustworthy quantitative projections of future flood hazard, in order to reduce flood risk one should focus attention on mapping of current and future risks and vulnerability hotspots and improve the situation there. Although an intercomparison of flood hazard projections is done in this paper and differences are identified and interpreted, it does not seems possible to recommend which large-scale studies may be considered most credible in particular areas of Europe. EDITOR D. Koutsoyiannis ASSOCIATE EDITOR not assigned",
keywords = "climate change, decision making, Europe, flood hazard, projections, science–policy interactions",
author = "Kundzewicz, {Z. W.} and V. Krysanova and R. Dankers and Yukiko Hirabayashi and S. Kanae and Hattermann, {F. F.} and S. Huang and Milly, {P. C.D.} and M. Stoffel and Driessen, {P. P.J.} and P. Matczak and P. Quevauviller and Schellnhuber, {H. J.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/02626667.2016.1241398",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Hydrological Sciences Journal",
issn = "0262-6667",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in flood hazard projections in Europe–their causes and consequences for decision making

AU - Kundzewicz, Z. W.

AU - Krysanova, V.

AU - Dankers, R.

AU - Hirabayashi, Yukiko

AU - Kanae, S.

AU - Hattermann, F. F.

AU - Huang, S.

AU - Milly, P. C.D.

AU - Stoffel, M.

AU - Driessen, P. P.J.

AU - Matczak, P.

AU - Quevauviller, P.

AU - Schellnhuber, H. J.

PY - 2017/1/2

Y1 - 2017/1/2

N2 - This paper interprets differences in flood hazard projections over Europe and identifies likely sources of discrepancy. Further, it discusses potential implications of these differences for flood risk reduction and adaptation to climate change. The discrepancy in flood hazard projections raises caution, especially among decision makers in charge of water resources management, flood risk reduction, and climate change adaptation at regional to local scales. Because it is naïve to expect availability of trustworthy quantitative projections of future flood hazard, in order to reduce flood risk one should focus attention on mapping of current and future risks and vulnerability hotspots and improve the situation there. Although an intercomparison of flood hazard projections is done in this paper and differences are identified and interpreted, it does not seems possible to recommend which large-scale studies may be considered most credible in particular areas of Europe. EDITOR D. Koutsoyiannis ASSOCIATE EDITOR not assigned

AB - This paper interprets differences in flood hazard projections over Europe and identifies likely sources of discrepancy. Further, it discusses potential implications of these differences for flood risk reduction and adaptation to climate change. The discrepancy in flood hazard projections raises caution, especially among decision makers in charge of water resources management, flood risk reduction, and climate change adaptation at regional to local scales. Because it is naïve to expect availability of trustworthy quantitative projections of future flood hazard, in order to reduce flood risk one should focus attention on mapping of current and future risks and vulnerability hotspots and improve the situation there. Although an intercomparison of flood hazard projections is done in this paper and differences are identified and interpreted, it does not seems possible to recommend which large-scale studies may be considered most credible in particular areas of Europe. EDITOR D. Koutsoyiannis ASSOCIATE EDITOR not assigned

KW - climate change

KW - decision making

KW - Europe

KW - flood hazard

KW - projections

KW - science–policy interactions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992341754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992341754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02626667.2016.1241398

DO - 10.1080/02626667.2016.1241398

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Hydrological Sciences Journal

JF - Hydrological Sciences Journal

SN - 0262-6667

IS - 1

ER -