Establishing a new index of muscle cross-sectional area and its relationship with isometric muscle strength

Ryota Akagi, Hiroaki Kanehisa, Yasuo Kawakami, Tetsuo Fukunaga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study aimed i) to establish an index of muscle crosssectional area (CSA) based on muscle thickness and circumference through a comparison with muscle CSA determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ii) to examine the relationships between muscle strength and the index determined at rest and during the maximal isometric contraction. The muscle CSA of elbow flexors at 60% of the upper arm length (CSA60) and the maximal CSA of elbow flexors (CSAmax) were measured using MRI in 26 men and 8 women. The muscle thickness (MT) of elbow flexors and the circumference (C) of upper arm at 60% of the upper arm length were measured using ultrasonography and anthropometry, respectively, in 29 men and 9 women. The measurements of MT and C were performed in the resting (MTr and Cr) and contracted condition (MTm and Cm), where the subjects performed maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of isometric elbow joint flexion. The torque developed during MVC was converted into the muscle force (F) of elbow flexors. The MTr × Cr was significantly correlated both with CSA60 and CSAmax (P < 0.001). The F was significantly correlated with MTm × Cm (r = 0.847, P < 0.001) and MTr 3 Cr (r = 0.839, P < 0.001). However, stepwise multiple regression analysis selected only MTm × Cm as a significant contributor for estimating F. The present study indicates that MT × C reflects muscle CSA, and can be an index for assessing muscle CSA. In addition, the findings obtained here showed a possibility that MT × C during MVC is more closely related to F than that at rest.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)82-87
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume22
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Jan
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Circumference
  • Elbow flexors
  • Maximal isometric contraction
  • Muscle thickness
  • Ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Establishing a new index of muscle cross-sectional area and its relationship with isometric muscle strength. / Akagi, Ryota; Kanehisa, Hiroaki; Kawakami, Yasuo; Fukunaga, Tetsuo.

In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 82-87.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8a0adb3fd50347f5b1f47eb1d34f1ff5,
title = "Establishing a new index of muscle cross-sectional area and its relationship with isometric muscle strength",
abstract = "The present study aimed i) to establish an index of muscle crosssectional area (CSA) based on muscle thickness and circumference through a comparison with muscle CSA determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ii) to examine the relationships between muscle strength and the index determined at rest and during the maximal isometric contraction. The muscle CSA of elbow flexors at 60{\%} of the upper arm length (CSA60) and the maximal CSA of elbow flexors (CSAmax) were measured using MRI in 26 men and 8 women. The muscle thickness (MT) of elbow flexors and the circumference (C) of upper arm at 60{\%} of the upper arm length were measured using ultrasonography and anthropometry, respectively, in 29 men and 9 women. The measurements of MT and C were performed in the resting (MTr and Cr) and contracted condition (MTm and Cm), where the subjects performed maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of isometric elbow joint flexion. The torque developed during MVC was converted into the muscle force (F) of elbow flexors. The MTr × Cr was significantly correlated both with CSA60 and CSAmax (P < 0.001). The F was significantly correlated with MTm × Cm (r = 0.847, P < 0.001) and MTr 3 Cr (r = 0.839, P < 0.001). However, stepwise multiple regression analysis selected only MTm × Cm as a significant contributor for estimating F. The present study indicates that MT × C reflects muscle CSA, and can be an index for assessing muscle CSA. In addition, the findings obtained here showed a possibility that MT × C during MVC is more closely related to F than that at rest.",
keywords = "Circumference, Elbow flexors, Maximal isometric contraction, Muscle thickness, Ultrasonography",
author = "Ryota Akagi and Hiroaki Kanehisa and Yasuo Kawakami and Tetsuo Fukunaga",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "82--87",
journal = "Strength and Conditioning Journal",
issn = "1524-1602",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Establishing a new index of muscle cross-sectional area and its relationship with isometric muscle strength

AU - Akagi, Ryota

AU - Kanehisa, Hiroaki

AU - Kawakami, Yasuo

AU - Fukunaga, Tetsuo

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - The present study aimed i) to establish an index of muscle crosssectional area (CSA) based on muscle thickness and circumference through a comparison with muscle CSA determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ii) to examine the relationships between muscle strength and the index determined at rest and during the maximal isometric contraction. The muscle CSA of elbow flexors at 60% of the upper arm length (CSA60) and the maximal CSA of elbow flexors (CSAmax) were measured using MRI in 26 men and 8 women. The muscle thickness (MT) of elbow flexors and the circumference (C) of upper arm at 60% of the upper arm length were measured using ultrasonography and anthropometry, respectively, in 29 men and 9 women. The measurements of MT and C were performed in the resting (MTr and Cr) and contracted condition (MTm and Cm), where the subjects performed maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of isometric elbow joint flexion. The torque developed during MVC was converted into the muscle force (F) of elbow flexors. The MTr × Cr was significantly correlated both with CSA60 and CSAmax (P < 0.001). The F was significantly correlated with MTm × Cm (r = 0.847, P < 0.001) and MTr 3 Cr (r = 0.839, P < 0.001). However, stepwise multiple regression analysis selected only MTm × Cm as a significant contributor for estimating F. The present study indicates that MT × C reflects muscle CSA, and can be an index for assessing muscle CSA. In addition, the findings obtained here showed a possibility that MT × C during MVC is more closely related to F than that at rest.

AB - The present study aimed i) to establish an index of muscle crosssectional area (CSA) based on muscle thickness and circumference through a comparison with muscle CSA determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ii) to examine the relationships between muscle strength and the index determined at rest and during the maximal isometric contraction. The muscle CSA of elbow flexors at 60% of the upper arm length (CSA60) and the maximal CSA of elbow flexors (CSAmax) were measured using MRI in 26 men and 8 women. The muscle thickness (MT) of elbow flexors and the circumference (C) of upper arm at 60% of the upper arm length were measured using ultrasonography and anthropometry, respectively, in 29 men and 9 women. The measurements of MT and C were performed in the resting (MTr and Cr) and contracted condition (MTm and Cm), where the subjects performed maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of isometric elbow joint flexion. The torque developed during MVC was converted into the muscle force (F) of elbow flexors. The MTr × Cr was significantly correlated both with CSA60 and CSAmax (P < 0.001). The F was significantly correlated with MTm × Cm (r = 0.847, P < 0.001) and MTr 3 Cr (r = 0.839, P < 0.001). However, stepwise multiple regression analysis selected only MTm × Cm as a significant contributor for estimating F. The present study indicates that MT × C reflects muscle CSA, and can be an index for assessing muscle CSA. In addition, the findings obtained here showed a possibility that MT × C during MVC is more closely related to F than that at rest.

KW - Circumference

KW - Elbow flexors

KW - Maximal isometric contraction

KW - Muscle thickness

KW - Ultrasonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41649087626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41649087626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 82

EP - 87

JO - Strength and Conditioning Journal

JF - Strength and Conditioning Journal

SN - 1524-1602

IS - 1

ER -