TY - GEN
T1 - Estimation of pressure-distribution effects upon elasticity imaging
AU - Matsumura, T.
AU - Shinomura, R.
AU - Mitake, T.
AU - Kanda, H.
AU - Yamakawa, M.
AU - Shiina, T.
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - We have already proposed the real-time strain imaging techniques (ca. 12 fps) for stable diagnosis in freehand and image classification method for the breast tissue diagnosis. For the objective diagnosis, most important problem is come from the fact that the strain image patterns were strongly depending on the magnitude and uniformity of the compression. In this paper, we investigate the pressure-distribution effects on the elasticity imaging using the tissue-mimicking elastography phantoms. We prepared 5 types of elastography phantoms with different stiffness. Phantoms #1-#3 have uniform stiffness overall in the rectangular solids and #4-#5 include small rectangular solids with different stiffness from surroundings. The phantom stiffness was estimated from the distribution of pressure and induced strain using our elasticity imaging system as follows. (1) The Young's moduli of first three phantoms were estimated as 6±1 kPa, 27±4 kPa, and 108±23 kPa, respectively. (2) In the case of phantoms #4 and #5, outer parts were estimated as 6±1 kPa and 8±2 kPa, and inclusion parts were measured as 12±1 kPa and 58±14 kPa, respectively. (3) For the special case of above phantom #1, we applied non-uniform pressure (3 times difference between each lateral limits). Even in that case, we successfully reduced the effect of non-uniformity from 235 % to 5 % in elasticity imaging.
AB - We have already proposed the real-time strain imaging techniques (ca. 12 fps) for stable diagnosis in freehand and image classification method for the breast tissue diagnosis. For the objective diagnosis, most important problem is come from the fact that the strain image patterns were strongly depending on the magnitude and uniformity of the compression. In this paper, we investigate the pressure-distribution effects on the elasticity imaging using the tissue-mimicking elastography phantoms. We prepared 5 types of elastography phantoms with different stiffness. Phantoms #1-#3 have uniform stiffness overall in the rectangular solids and #4-#5 include small rectangular solids with different stiffness from surroundings. The phantom stiffness was estimated from the distribution of pressure and induced strain using our elasticity imaging system as follows. (1) The Young's moduli of first three phantoms were estimated as 6±1 kPa, 27±4 kPa, and 108±23 kPa, respectively. (2) In the case of phantoms #4 and #5, outer parts were estimated as 6±1 kPa and 8±2 kPa, and inclusion parts were measured as 12±1 kPa and 58±14 kPa, respectively. (3) For the special case of above phantom #1, we applied non-uniform pressure (3 times difference between each lateral limits). Even in that case, we successfully reduced the effect of non-uniformity from 235 % to 5 % in elasticity imaging.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847154581&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847154581&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ULTSYM.2005.1603207
DO - 10.1109/ULTSYM.2005.1603207
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:33847154581
SN - 0780393821
SN - 9780780393820
T3 - Proceedings - IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium
SP - 1759
EP - 1762
BT - 2005 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium
T2 - 2005 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium
Y2 - 18 September 2005 through 21 September 2005
ER -