Hand Sensory Rehabilitation System Which Incorporated Visual and Tactile Feedback

Yuta Hagiwara, Keisuke Takeda, Shinichirou Yamamoto, Yukio Saito

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

In this study, we have been developing a rehabilitation system that combining a motor and sensory function recovery device and a measuring device for a hand sensory. These devices are purposely developed for paralyzed patients. The rehabilitation system was named HSRS (Hand Sensory Rehabilitation system) and it's consists of a training device hand sensory function, a computer to control the device, and an external monitor displays an obtained data from sensors. The training device is able to applycontinuous mechanical stimulation to the hand of a user by grasping the device probe. On the monitor, the self-made Graphical User Interface (GUI) is displayed. An operator instructs the user to match the target value to the measured value in the training. When the user operates the switches, and the device measures the point that contacted with the probe. We did two experiments by using these devices. One is stimulus evaluation experiment. In this experiment, three frequencies (30 [Hz], 60[Hz], 100[Hz]) were given to the human hand and we verified which frequency was most effective. Using a slide caliper and the device to measure sensory function, we evaluated the difference in sensory degree of each healthy subject between before and after using the training device. As a result, we found 60[Hz] is the most effective frequency. In the second experiment, we let a subject follow a target value of GUI. In this experiment, we examined the relation between the sensory function and the motor function and investigated the best evaluation parameter when training the paralyzed patient. As a result, we didn't get difference in the results when comparing in sports experience. However, we got a particularly big difference of the magnitude of the residual during accelerated and deceleration time of the gripping with other items. Moreover, when comparing those who are good and not good sensory in sensory function measurement experiments, there was a tendency that the subjects with not good sensory have the bigger difference with the target value. We confirmed the utility of the measuring devise and the relationship between motor and sensory function.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - 2018 12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Mecatronics 2018
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages346-351
Number of pages6
ISBN (Electronic)9781538629826
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Oct 17
Event12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Mecatronics 2018 - Tsu, Japan
Duration: 2018 Sep 102018 Sep 12

Publication series

NameProceedings - 2018 12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Mecatronics 2018

Other

Other12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Mecatronics 2018
CountryJapan
CityTsu
Period18/9/1018/9/12

Fingerprint

Patient rehabilitation
Feedback
Experiments
Graphical user interfaces
Deceleration
Sports
Switches
Recovery
Sensors

Keywords

  • Hand Rehabilitation
  • Paralysis patients
  • Sensory evaluation
  • Tactile sensory
  • Visual feedback

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Signal Processing
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Modelling and Simulation
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Control and Optimization
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Hagiwara, Y., Takeda, K., Yamamoto, S., & Saito, Y. (2018). Hand Sensory Rehabilitation System Which Incorporated Visual and Tactile Feedback. In Proceedings - 2018 12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Mecatronics 2018 (pp. 346-351). [8495868] (Proceedings - 2018 12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Mecatronics 2018). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/MECATRONICS.2018.8495868

Hand Sensory Rehabilitation System Which Incorporated Visual and Tactile Feedback. / Hagiwara, Yuta; Takeda, Keisuke; Yamamoto, Shinichirou; Saito, Yukio.

Proceedings - 2018 12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Mecatronics 2018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2018. p. 346-351 8495868 (Proceedings - 2018 12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Mecatronics 2018).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Hagiwara, Y, Takeda, K, Yamamoto, S & Saito, Y 2018, Hand Sensory Rehabilitation System Which Incorporated Visual and Tactile Feedback. in Proceedings - 2018 12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Mecatronics 2018., 8495868, Proceedings - 2018 12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Mecatronics 2018, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 346-351, 12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Mecatronics 2018, Tsu, Japan, 18/9/10. https://doi.org/10.1109/MECATRONICS.2018.8495868
Hagiwara Y, Takeda K, Yamamoto S, Saito Y. Hand Sensory Rehabilitation System Which Incorporated Visual and Tactile Feedback. In Proceedings - 2018 12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Mecatronics 2018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2018. p. 346-351. 8495868. (Proceedings - 2018 12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Mecatronics 2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/MECATRONICS.2018.8495868
Hagiwara, Yuta ; Takeda, Keisuke ; Yamamoto, Shinichirou ; Saito, Yukio. / Hand Sensory Rehabilitation System Which Incorporated Visual and Tactile Feedback. Proceedings - 2018 12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Mecatronics 2018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2018. pp. 346-351 (Proceedings - 2018 12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Mecatronics 2018).
@inproceedings{ff46dbb1855d469f95f5ec23d24c8a9d,
title = "Hand Sensory Rehabilitation System Which Incorporated Visual and Tactile Feedback",
abstract = "In this study, we have been developing a rehabilitation system that combining a motor and sensory function recovery device and a measuring device for a hand sensory. These devices are purposely developed for paralyzed patients. The rehabilitation system was named HSRS (Hand Sensory Rehabilitation system) and it's consists of a training device hand sensory function, a computer to control the device, and an external monitor displays an obtained data from sensors. The training device is able to applycontinuous mechanical stimulation to the hand of a user by grasping the device probe. On the monitor, the self-made Graphical User Interface (GUI) is displayed. An operator instructs the user to match the target value to the measured value in the training. When the user operates the switches, and the device measures the point that contacted with the probe. We did two experiments by using these devices. One is stimulus evaluation experiment. In this experiment, three frequencies (30 [Hz], 60[Hz], 100[Hz]) were given to the human hand and we verified which frequency was most effective. Using a slide caliper and the device to measure sensory function, we evaluated the difference in sensory degree of each healthy subject between before and after using the training device. As a result, we found 60[Hz] is the most effective frequency. In the second experiment, we let a subject follow a target value of GUI. In this experiment, we examined the relation between the sensory function and the motor function and investigated the best evaluation parameter when training the paralyzed patient. As a result, we didn't get difference in the results when comparing in sports experience. However, we got a particularly big difference of the magnitude of the residual during accelerated and deceleration time of the gripping with other items. Moreover, when comparing those who are good and not good sensory in sensory function measurement experiments, there was a tendency that the subjects with not good sensory have the bigger difference with the target value. We confirmed the utility of the measuring devise and the relationship between motor and sensory function.",
keywords = "Hand Rehabilitation, Paralysis patients, Sensory evaluation, Tactile sensory, Visual feedback",
author = "Yuta Hagiwara and Keisuke Takeda and Shinichirou Yamamoto and Yukio Saito",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1109/MECATRONICS.2018.8495868",
language = "English",
series = "Proceedings - 2018 12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Mecatronics 2018",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
pages = "346--351",
booktitle = "Proceedings - 2018 12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Mecatronics 2018",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Hand Sensory Rehabilitation System Which Incorporated Visual and Tactile Feedback

AU - Hagiwara, Yuta

AU - Takeda, Keisuke

AU - Yamamoto, Shinichirou

AU - Saito, Yukio

PY - 2018/10/17

Y1 - 2018/10/17

N2 - In this study, we have been developing a rehabilitation system that combining a motor and sensory function recovery device and a measuring device for a hand sensory. These devices are purposely developed for paralyzed patients. The rehabilitation system was named HSRS (Hand Sensory Rehabilitation system) and it's consists of a training device hand sensory function, a computer to control the device, and an external monitor displays an obtained data from sensors. The training device is able to applycontinuous mechanical stimulation to the hand of a user by grasping the device probe. On the monitor, the self-made Graphical User Interface (GUI) is displayed. An operator instructs the user to match the target value to the measured value in the training. When the user operates the switches, and the device measures the point that contacted with the probe. We did two experiments by using these devices. One is stimulus evaluation experiment. In this experiment, three frequencies (30 [Hz], 60[Hz], 100[Hz]) were given to the human hand and we verified which frequency was most effective. Using a slide caliper and the device to measure sensory function, we evaluated the difference in sensory degree of each healthy subject between before and after using the training device. As a result, we found 60[Hz] is the most effective frequency. In the second experiment, we let a subject follow a target value of GUI. In this experiment, we examined the relation between the sensory function and the motor function and investigated the best evaluation parameter when training the paralyzed patient. As a result, we didn't get difference in the results when comparing in sports experience. However, we got a particularly big difference of the magnitude of the residual during accelerated and deceleration time of the gripping with other items. Moreover, when comparing those who are good and not good sensory in sensory function measurement experiments, there was a tendency that the subjects with not good sensory have the bigger difference with the target value. We confirmed the utility of the measuring devise and the relationship between motor and sensory function.

AB - In this study, we have been developing a rehabilitation system that combining a motor and sensory function recovery device and a measuring device for a hand sensory. These devices are purposely developed for paralyzed patients. The rehabilitation system was named HSRS (Hand Sensory Rehabilitation system) and it's consists of a training device hand sensory function, a computer to control the device, and an external monitor displays an obtained data from sensors. The training device is able to applycontinuous mechanical stimulation to the hand of a user by grasping the device probe. On the monitor, the self-made Graphical User Interface (GUI) is displayed. An operator instructs the user to match the target value to the measured value in the training. When the user operates the switches, and the device measures the point that contacted with the probe. We did two experiments by using these devices. One is stimulus evaluation experiment. In this experiment, three frequencies (30 [Hz], 60[Hz], 100[Hz]) were given to the human hand and we verified which frequency was most effective. Using a slide caliper and the device to measure sensory function, we evaluated the difference in sensory degree of each healthy subject between before and after using the training device. As a result, we found 60[Hz] is the most effective frequency. In the second experiment, we let a subject follow a target value of GUI. In this experiment, we examined the relation between the sensory function and the motor function and investigated the best evaluation parameter when training the paralyzed patient. As a result, we didn't get difference in the results when comparing in sports experience. However, we got a particularly big difference of the magnitude of the residual during accelerated and deceleration time of the gripping with other items. Moreover, when comparing those who are good and not good sensory in sensory function measurement experiments, there was a tendency that the subjects with not good sensory have the bigger difference with the target value. We confirmed the utility of the measuring devise and the relationship between motor and sensory function.

KW - Hand Rehabilitation

KW - Paralysis patients

KW - Sensory evaluation

KW - Tactile sensory

KW - Visual feedback

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057212602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057212602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/MECATRONICS.2018.8495868

DO - 10.1109/MECATRONICS.2018.8495868

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85057212602

T3 - Proceedings - 2018 12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Mecatronics 2018

SP - 346

EP - 351

BT - Proceedings - 2018 12th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, Mecatronics 2018

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

ER -