Methodological issues related to thickness-based muscle size evaluation

Ryota Akagi, Soichiro Iwanuma, Masato Fukuoka, Hiroaki Kanehisa, Tetsuo Fukunaga, Yasuo Kawakami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to highlight the issues related to thickness-based muscle size evaluation that is commonly done in field studies. The cross-sectional area, thickness (the vertical distance from the upper end of the elbow flexors to that of the humerus) and width (the horizontal distance from the left to the right end of the elbow flexors) of the elbow flexors at levels from the reference site (60% of the upper arm length from the acromial process of the scapula to the lateral epicondyle of the humerus) to 5 cm distal to it were determined in 11 young men using magnetic resonance imaging, both at rest and during isometric elbow flexion at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction. During 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, the thickness increased but the width decreased at each measurement site compared with those at rest. This was possibly due to difference in muscle slackness between both conditions. The correlation coefficients between the thickness and cross-sectional area for the elbow flexors were significantly lower at rest (r=0.551-0.856) than during 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (r=0.711-0.922). The present findings indicate that the thickness-based muscle size measurement at rest includes errors owing to the slackness of the resting muscles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169-174
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Physiological Anthropology
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Muscle
evaluation
Magnetic resonance
Imaging techniques

Keywords

  • Isometric contraction
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Muscle cross-sectional area
  • Muscle slackness
  • Muscle width

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Anthropology

Cite this

Methodological issues related to thickness-based muscle size evaluation. / Akagi, Ryota; Iwanuma, Soichiro; Fukuoka, Masato; Kanehisa, Hiroaki; Fukunaga, Tetsuo; Kawakami, Yasuo.

In: Journal of Physiological Anthropology, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2011, p. 169-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Akagi, R, Iwanuma, S, Fukuoka, M, Kanehisa, H, Fukunaga, T & Kawakami, Y 2011, 'Methodological issues related to thickness-based muscle size evaluation', Journal of Physiological Anthropology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 169-174. https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa2.30.169
Akagi, Ryota ; Iwanuma, Soichiro ; Fukuoka, Masato ; Kanehisa, Hiroaki ; Fukunaga, Tetsuo ; Kawakami, Yasuo. / Methodological issues related to thickness-based muscle size evaluation. In: Journal of Physiological Anthropology. 2011 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 169-174.
@article{200c7d1bfe97491f81d4e33ca73d421f,
title = "Methodological issues related to thickness-based muscle size evaluation",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to highlight the issues related to thickness-based muscle size evaluation that is commonly done in field studies. The cross-sectional area, thickness (the vertical distance from the upper end of the elbow flexors to that of the humerus) and width (the horizontal distance from the left to the right end of the elbow flexors) of the elbow flexors at levels from the reference site (60{\%} of the upper arm length from the acromial process of the scapula to the lateral epicondyle of the humerus) to 5 cm distal to it were determined in 11 young men using magnetic resonance imaging, both at rest and during isometric elbow flexion at 30{\%} of maximal voluntary contraction. During 30{\%} of maximal voluntary contraction, the thickness increased but the width decreased at each measurement site compared with those at rest. This was possibly due to difference in muscle slackness between both conditions. The correlation coefficients between the thickness and cross-sectional area for the elbow flexors were significantly lower at rest (r=0.551-0.856) than during 30{\%} of maximal voluntary contraction (r=0.711-0.922). The present findings indicate that the thickness-based muscle size measurement at rest includes errors owing to the slackness of the resting muscles.",
keywords = "Isometric contraction, Magnetic resonance imaging, Muscle cross-sectional area, Muscle slackness, Muscle width",
author = "Ryota Akagi and Soichiro Iwanuma and Masato Fukuoka and Hiroaki Kanehisa and Tetsuo Fukunaga and Yasuo Kawakami",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.2114/jpa2.30.169",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "169--174",
journal = "Journal of Physiological Anthropology",
issn = "1880-6791",
publisher = "Japan Society of Physiological Anthropology",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological issues related to thickness-based muscle size evaluation

AU - Akagi, Ryota

AU - Iwanuma, Soichiro

AU - Fukuoka, Masato

AU - Kanehisa, Hiroaki

AU - Fukunaga, Tetsuo

AU - Kawakami, Yasuo

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The purpose of this study was to highlight the issues related to thickness-based muscle size evaluation that is commonly done in field studies. The cross-sectional area, thickness (the vertical distance from the upper end of the elbow flexors to that of the humerus) and width (the horizontal distance from the left to the right end of the elbow flexors) of the elbow flexors at levels from the reference site (60% of the upper arm length from the acromial process of the scapula to the lateral epicondyle of the humerus) to 5 cm distal to it were determined in 11 young men using magnetic resonance imaging, both at rest and during isometric elbow flexion at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction. During 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, the thickness increased but the width decreased at each measurement site compared with those at rest. This was possibly due to difference in muscle slackness between both conditions. The correlation coefficients between the thickness and cross-sectional area for the elbow flexors were significantly lower at rest (r=0.551-0.856) than during 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (r=0.711-0.922). The present findings indicate that the thickness-based muscle size measurement at rest includes errors owing to the slackness of the resting muscles.

AB - The purpose of this study was to highlight the issues related to thickness-based muscle size evaluation that is commonly done in field studies. The cross-sectional area, thickness (the vertical distance from the upper end of the elbow flexors to that of the humerus) and width (the horizontal distance from the left to the right end of the elbow flexors) of the elbow flexors at levels from the reference site (60% of the upper arm length from the acromial process of the scapula to the lateral epicondyle of the humerus) to 5 cm distal to it were determined in 11 young men using magnetic resonance imaging, both at rest and during isometric elbow flexion at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction. During 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, the thickness increased but the width decreased at each measurement site compared with those at rest. This was possibly due to difference in muscle slackness between both conditions. The correlation coefficients between the thickness and cross-sectional area for the elbow flexors were significantly lower at rest (r=0.551-0.856) than during 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (r=0.711-0.922). The present findings indicate that the thickness-based muscle size measurement at rest includes errors owing to the slackness of the resting muscles.

KW - Isometric contraction

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Muscle cross-sectional area

KW - Muscle slackness

KW - Muscle width

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051593645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051593645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2114/jpa2.30.169

DO - 10.2114/jpa2.30.169

M3 - Article

C2 - 21804300

AN - SCOPUS:80051593645

VL - 30

SP - 169

EP - 174

JO - Journal of Physiological Anthropology

JF - Journal of Physiological Anthropology

SN - 1880-6791

IS - 4

ER -