Abstract
Predictive and correlative analyses of the forces vibration tests ('FVT' for short, hereafter) and seismic response of the large-scale embedded structure were performed as one of the analytical phases of an international large-scale seismic test (LSST) program (Tang et al., 1991) at Hualien, Taiwan. Consequently, the following was clarified; (1) FVT analysis using unified ground model (UMFVT2) predicted the fundamental system frequency (f0) about 20% higher than the test. (2) After careful investigation on several items cited as the presumed causes of f0 discrepancy between the test and the prediction, it was attributed to the Vs of the backfill, and best correlated ground model (BCFVT2) was formed, based on it. (3) Seismic response analysis using BCFVT2 brought a bit better agreement with the observation than using UMFVT2, but from another viewpoint, both analysis results agreed fairly well with the observation, indicating that backfill Vs does not affect seismic response so much as during FVT.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 289-295 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Nuclear Engineering and Design |
| Volume | 172 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 1997 Oct |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Energy Engineering and Power Technology
- Nuclear Energy and Engineering
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Mechanical Engineering
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Cite this
Seismic response analysis of embedded structure at Hualien, Taiwan. / Ueshima, Teruyuki; Kokusho, Takeji; Okamoto, Toshiro; Yajima, Hiroshi.
In: Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 172, No. 3, 10.1997, p. 289-295.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Seismic response analysis of embedded structure at Hualien, Taiwan
AU - Ueshima, Teruyuki
AU - Kokusho, Takeji
AU - Okamoto, Toshiro
AU - Yajima, Hiroshi
PY - 1997/10
Y1 - 1997/10
N2 - Predictive and correlative analyses of the forces vibration tests ('FVT' for short, hereafter) and seismic response of the large-scale embedded structure were performed as one of the analytical phases of an international large-scale seismic test (LSST) program (Tang et al., 1991) at Hualien, Taiwan. Consequently, the following was clarified; (1) FVT analysis using unified ground model (UMFVT2) predicted the fundamental system frequency (f0) about 20% higher than the test. (2) After careful investigation on several items cited as the presumed causes of f0 discrepancy between the test and the prediction, it was attributed to the Vs of the backfill, and best correlated ground model (BCFVT2) was formed, based on it. (3) Seismic response analysis using BCFVT2 brought a bit better agreement with the observation than using UMFVT2, but from another viewpoint, both analysis results agreed fairly well with the observation, indicating that backfill Vs does not affect seismic response so much as during FVT.
AB - Predictive and correlative analyses of the forces vibration tests ('FVT' for short, hereafter) and seismic response of the large-scale embedded structure were performed as one of the analytical phases of an international large-scale seismic test (LSST) program (Tang et al., 1991) at Hualien, Taiwan. Consequently, the following was clarified; (1) FVT analysis using unified ground model (UMFVT2) predicted the fundamental system frequency (f0) about 20% higher than the test. (2) After careful investigation on several items cited as the presumed causes of f0 discrepancy between the test and the prediction, it was attributed to the Vs of the backfill, and best correlated ground model (BCFVT2) was formed, based on it. (3) Seismic response analysis using BCFVT2 brought a bit better agreement with the observation than using UMFVT2, but from another viewpoint, both analysis results agreed fairly well with the observation, indicating that backfill Vs does not affect seismic response so much as during FVT.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30244455620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30244455620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
VL - 172
SP - 289
EP - 295
JO - Nuclear Engineering and Design
JF - Nuclear Engineering and Design
SN - 0029-5493
IS - 3
ER -