Sensitivity of Global Hydrological Simulations to Groundwater Capillary Flux Parameterizations

Sujan Koirala, Hyungjun Kim, Yukiko Hirabayashi, Shinjiro Kanae, Taikan Oki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Global land surface and hydrologic models, used to quantify the influence of groundwater (GW) dynamics on land surface hydrology, vary in parameterizations of the GW capillary flux and depth of moisture flux exchange between GW and unsaturated soil column (interaction depth). In this study, we demonstrate that the parameterization of capillary flux significantly affects the magnitude of GW-supported ET (±15%) and GW recharge (±25%). The largest sensitivities are associated with a strong dependence of the capillary flux parameterization on water table depth (WTD) with further controls by soil hydraulic properties. Under shallow WTD condition, the finer soils show a larger GW-supported ET for parameterization that depends only on WTD. Further, GW-supported ET reduces by 7–13% per meter increase in interaction depth used in simulation compared to simulation in which the interaction depth varies in space and time with WTD. The simulations of runoff, soil moisture, and WTD are even more sensitive to the difference in parameterization and interaction depth. Moreover, these sensitivities vary largely in both space and time. Evaluations against observation-based data and previous modeling simulations reveal that simulations with capillary flux perform better than that the one without it in regions with large GW-supported ET. We concur that capillary flux has a large and nonnegligible influence in global hydrologic simulation. But, the spatiotemporal variabilities of sensitivities of hydrological fluxes and storages demonstrate that different parameterization of GW capillary flux may also lead to a substantial uncertainty in global hydrologic simulations and subsequent water resources assessments.

Original languageEnglish
JournalWater Resources Research
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2019 Jan 1

Fingerprint

parameterization
groundwater
simulation
water table
land surface
moisture flux
resource assessment
hydraulic property
soil column
recharge
hydrology
shallow water
soil
soil moisture
soil water
water resource
runoff
modeling

Keywords

  • capillary flux
  • global groundwater hydrology
  • groundwater recharge
  • groundwater resources
  • uncertainties

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Sensitivity of Global Hydrological Simulations to Groundwater Capillary Flux Parameterizations. / Koirala, Sujan; Kim, Hyungjun; Hirabayashi, Yukiko; Kanae, Shinjiro; Oki, Taikan.

In: Water Resources Research, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c22c43909fcd49a28a696ba81c536852,
title = "Sensitivity of Global Hydrological Simulations to Groundwater Capillary Flux Parameterizations",
abstract = "Global land surface and hydrologic models, used to quantify the influence of groundwater (GW) dynamics on land surface hydrology, vary in parameterizations of the GW capillary flux and depth of moisture flux exchange between GW and unsaturated soil column (interaction depth). In this study, we demonstrate that the parameterization of capillary flux significantly affects the magnitude of GW-supported ET (±15{\%}) and GW recharge (±25{\%}). The largest sensitivities are associated with a strong dependence of the capillary flux parameterization on water table depth (WTD) with further controls by soil hydraulic properties. Under shallow WTD condition, the finer soils show a larger GW-supported ET for parameterization that depends only on WTD. Further, GW-supported ET reduces by 7–13{\%} per meter increase in interaction depth used in simulation compared to simulation in which the interaction depth varies in space and time with WTD. The simulations of runoff, soil moisture, and WTD are even more sensitive to the difference in parameterization and interaction depth. Moreover, these sensitivities vary largely in both space and time. Evaluations against observation-based data and previous modeling simulations reveal that simulations with capillary flux perform better than that the one without it in regions with large GW-supported ET. We concur that capillary flux has a large and nonnegligible influence in global hydrologic simulation. But, the spatiotemporal variabilities of sensitivities of hydrological fluxes and storages demonstrate that different parameterization of GW capillary flux may also lead to a substantial uncertainty in global hydrologic simulations and subsequent water resources assessments.",
keywords = "capillary flux, global groundwater hydrology, groundwater recharge, groundwater resources, uncertainties",
author = "Sujan Koirala and Hyungjun Kim and Yukiko Hirabayashi and Shinjiro Kanae and Taikan Oki",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1029/2018WR023434",
language = "English",
journal = "Water Resources Research",
issn = "0043-1397",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity of Global Hydrological Simulations to Groundwater Capillary Flux Parameterizations

AU - Koirala, Sujan

AU - Kim, Hyungjun

AU - Hirabayashi, Yukiko

AU - Kanae, Shinjiro

AU - Oki, Taikan

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Global land surface and hydrologic models, used to quantify the influence of groundwater (GW) dynamics on land surface hydrology, vary in parameterizations of the GW capillary flux and depth of moisture flux exchange between GW and unsaturated soil column (interaction depth). In this study, we demonstrate that the parameterization of capillary flux significantly affects the magnitude of GW-supported ET (±15%) and GW recharge (±25%). The largest sensitivities are associated with a strong dependence of the capillary flux parameterization on water table depth (WTD) with further controls by soil hydraulic properties. Under shallow WTD condition, the finer soils show a larger GW-supported ET for parameterization that depends only on WTD. Further, GW-supported ET reduces by 7–13% per meter increase in interaction depth used in simulation compared to simulation in which the interaction depth varies in space and time with WTD. The simulations of runoff, soil moisture, and WTD are even more sensitive to the difference in parameterization and interaction depth. Moreover, these sensitivities vary largely in both space and time. Evaluations against observation-based data and previous modeling simulations reveal that simulations with capillary flux perform better than that the one without it in regions with large GW-supported ET. We concur that capillary flux has a large and nonnegligible influence in global hydrologic simulation. But, the spatiotemporal variabilities of sensitivities of hydrological fluxes and storages demonstrate that different parameterization of GW capillary flux may also lead to a substantial uncertainty in global hydrologic simulations and subsequent water resources assessments.

AB - Global land surface and hydrologic models, used to quantify the influence of groundwater (GW) dynamics on land surface hydrology, vary in parameterizations of the GW capillary flux and depth of moisture flux exchange between GW and unsaturated soil column (interaction depth). In this study, we demonstrate that the parameterization of capillary flux significantly affects the magnitude of GW-supported ET (±15%) and GW recharge (±25%). The largest sensitivities are associated with a strong dependence of the capillary flux parameterization on water table depth (WTD) with further controls by soil hydraulic properties. Under shallow WTD condition, the finer soils show a larger GW-supported ET for parameterization that depends only on WTD. Further, GW-supported ET reduces by 7–13% per meter increase in interaction depth used in simulation compared to simulation in which the interaction depth varies in space and time with WTD. The simulations of runoff, soil moisture, and WTD are even more sensitive to the difference in parameterization and interaction depth. Moreover, these sensitivities vary largely in both space and time. Evaluations against observation-based data and previous modeling simulations reveal that simulations with capillary flux perform better than that the one without it in regions with large GW-supported ET. We concur that capillary flux has a large and nonnegligible influence in global hydrologic simulation. But, the spatiotemporal variabilities of sensitivities of hydrological fluxes and storages demonstrate that different parameterization of GW capillary flux may also lead to a substantial uncertainty in global hydrologic simulations and subsequent water resources assessments.

KW - capillary flux

KW - global groundwater hydrology

KW - groundwater recharge

KW - groundwater resources

KW - uncertainties

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060259479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060259479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/2018WR023434

DO - 10.1029/2018WR023434

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85060259479

JO - Water Resources Research

JF - Water Resources Research

SN - 0043-1397

ER -