@article{0e0d4753f57a4a2c8f3c61e72a56f008,
title = "Sensory evaluation and chemical analysis of exhaled and dermally emitted bioeffluents",
abstract = "Conditions in which exhaled and dermally emitted bioeffluents could be sampled separately or together (whole-body emission) were created. Five lightly dressed males exhaled the air through a mask to another, identical chamber or without a mask to the chamber in which they were sitting; the outdoor air supply rate was the same in both chambers. The carbon dioxide concentration in the chamber with exhaled air was 2000 ppm. Chamber temperatures were 23°C or 28°C, and ozone was present or absent in the supply airflow. When dermally emitted bioeffluents were present, the perceived air quality (PAQ) was less acceptable, and the odor intensity was higher than when only exhaled bioeffluents were present. The presence or absence of exhaled bioeffluents in the unoccupied chamber made no significant difference to sensory assessments. At 28°C and with ozone present, the odor intensity increased and the PAQ was less acceptable in the chambers with whole-body bioeffluents. The concentrations of nonanal, decanal, geranylacetone, and 6-MHO were higher when dermally emitted bioeffluents were present; they increased further when ozone was present. The concentration of squalene then decreased and increased again at 28°C. Dermally emitted bioeffluents seem to play a major role in the sensory nuisance experienced when occupied volumes are inadequately ventilated.",
keywords = "chemical analyses, dermally emitted bioeffluents, exhaled bioeffluents, human bioeffluents, indoor air quality (IAQ), sensory assessments",
author = "S. Tsushima and P. Wargocki and S. Tanabe",
note = "Funding Information: This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows and by the industrial sponsors supporting the International Centre for Indoor Environment and Energy in the Department of Civil Engineering at the Technical University of Denmark. The authors would like to thank Professor Charles J. Weschler of Rutgers University for his valuable comments regarding the interpretation of the chemical results, Professor Glenn C. Morrison of Missouri University of Science and Technology for his comments and advice on the chemical analyses, Dr Gabriel BekD堀 from the Centre for his help and advice regarding the experiment and his valuable comments on the draft version of the present manuscript, and Professor David P. Wyon for the comments and proofreading of the manuscript. The authors thank the Fraunhofer-lnstitut fur Bauphysik IB for their help in the chemical analysis. The authors are indebted to the subjects for their cooperation. Funding Information: This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows and by the industrial sponsors supporting the International Centre for Indoor Environment and Energy in the Department of Civil Engineering at the Technical University of Denmark. The authors would like to thank Professor Charles J. Weschler of Rutgers University for his valuable comments regarding the interpretation of the chemical results, Professor Glenn C. Morrison of Missouri University of Science and Technology for his comments and advice on the chemical analyses, Dr Gabriel Bek{\"o} from the Centre for his help and advice regarding the experiment and his valuable comments on the draft version of the present manuscript, and Professor David P. Wyon for the comments and proofreading of the manuscript. The authors thank the Fraunhofer-lnstitut fur Bauphysik IB for their help in the chemical analysis. The authors are indebted to the subjects for their cooperation. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 The Authors. Indoor Air published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd",
year = "2018",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1111/ina.12424",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "146--163",
journal = "Indoor Air",
issn = "0905-6947",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "1",
}