Understanding the water cycle over the upper Tarim Basin

Retrospecting the estimated discharge bias to atmospheric variables and model structure

Xudong Zhou, Jan Polcher, Tao Yang, Yukiko Hirabayashi, Trung Nguyen-Quang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The bias in atmospheric variables and that in model computation are two major causes of failures in discharge estimation. Attributing the bias in discharge estimation becomes difficult if the forcing bias cannot be evaluated and excluded in advance in places lacking qualified meteorological observations, especially in cold and mountainous areas (e.g., the upper Tarim Basin). In this study, we proposed an Organizing Carbon and Hydrology In Dynamic EcosystEms (ORCHIDEE)-Budyko framework which helps identify the bias range from the two sources (i.e., forcing and model structure) with a set of analytical approaches. The latest version of the land surface model ORCHIDEE was used to provide reliable discharge simulations based on the most improved forcing inputs. The Budyko approach was then introduced to attribute the discharge bias to two sources with prescribed assumptions. Results show that, as the forcing biases, the water inputs (rainfall, snowfall or glacier melt) are very likely underestimated for the Tarim headwater catchments span classCombining double low lineinline-formula 43.2 span % to 21.0%). Meanwhile, the potential evapotranspiration is unrealistically high over the upper Yarkand and the upper Hotan River (1240.4 and 1153.7mmyrspan classCombining double low lineinline-formula g'1/span , respectively). Determined by the model structure, the bias in actual evapotranspiration is possible but not the only contributor to the discharge underestimation (overestimated by up to 105.8% for the upper Aksu River). Based on a simple scaling approach, we estimated the water consumption by human intervention ranging from span classCombining double low lineinline-formula 213.50×108/span to span classCombining double low lineinline-formula 300.58×108/span mspan classCombining double low lineinline-formula/span yrspan classCombining double low lineinline-formula g'1/span at the Alar gauge station, which is another bias source in the current version of ORCHIDEE. This study succeeded in retrospecting the bias from the discharge estimation to multiple bias sources of the atmospheric variables and the model structure. The framework provides a unique method for evaluating the regional water cycle and its biases with our current knowledge of observational uncertainties.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6087-6108
Number of pages22
JournalHydrology and Earth System Sciences
Volume22
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Nov 28

Fingerprint

ecosystem dynamics
basin
hydrology
water
carbon
potential evapotranspiration
river
headwater
evapotranspiration
gauge
land surface
glacier
melt
catchment
rainfall
simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Understanding the water cycle over the upper Tarim Basin : Retrospecting the estimated discharge bias to atmospheric variables and model structure. / Zhou, Xudong; Polcher, Jan; Yang, Tao; Hirabayashi, Yukiko; Nguyen-Quang, Trung.

In: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 22, No. 11, 28.11.2018, p. 6087-6108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0caaf30fed8a4f42814a6b614c8a79e0,
title = "Understanding the water cycle over the upper Tarim Basin: Retrospecting the estimated discharge bias to atmospheric variables and model structure",
abstract = "The bias in atmospheric variables and that in model computation are two major causes of failures in discharge estimation. Attributing the bias in discharge estimation becomes difficult if the forcing bias cannot be evaluated and excluded in advance in places lacking qualified meteorological observations, especially in cold and mountainous areas (e.g., the upper Tarim Basin). In this study, we proposed an Organizing Carbon and Hydrology In Dynamic EcosystEms (ORCHIDEE)-Budyko framework which helps identify the bias range from the two sources (i.e., forcing and model structure) with a set of analytical approaches. The latest version of the land surface model ORCHIDEE was used to provide reliable discharge simulations based on the most improved forcing inputs. The Budyko approach was then introduced to attribute the discharge bias to two sources with prescribed assumptions. Results show that, as the forcing biases, the water inputs (rainfall, snowfall or glacier melt) are very likely underestimated for the Tarim headwater catchments span classCombining double low lineinline-formula 43.2 span {\%} to 21.0{\%}). Meanwhile, the potential evapotranspiration is unrealistically high over the upper Yarkand and the upper Hotan River (1240.4 and 1153.7mmyrspan classCombining double low lineinline-formula g'1/span , respectively). Determined by the model structure, the bias in actual evapotranspiration is possible but not the only contributor to the discharge underestimation (overestimated by up to 105.8{\%} for the upper Aksu River). Based on a simple scaling approach, we estimated the water consumption by human intervention ranging from span classCombining double low lineinline-formula 213.50×108/span to span classCombining double low lineinline-formula 300.58×108/span mspan classCombining double low lineinline-formula/span yrspan classCombining double low lineinline-formula g'1/span at the Alar gauge station, which is another bias source in the current version of ORCHIDEE. This study succeeded in retrospecting the bias from the discharge estimation to multiple bias sources of the atmospheric variables and the model structure. The framework provides a unique method for evaluating the regional water cycle and its biases with our current knowledge of observational uncertainties.",
author = "Xudong Zhou and Jan Polcher and Tao Yang and Yukiko Hirabayashi and Trung Nguyen-Quang",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "28",
doi = "10.5194/hess-22-6087-2018",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "6087--6108",
journal = "Hydrology and Earth System Sciences",
issn = "1027-5606",
publisher = "European Geosciences Union",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the water cycle over the upper Tarim Basin

T2 - Retrospecting the estimated discharge bias to atmospheric variables and model structure

AU - Zhou, Xudong

AU - Polcher, Jan

AU - Yang, Tao

AU - Hirabayashi, Yukiko

AU - Nguyen-Quang, Trung

PY - 2018/11/28

Y1 - 2018/11/28

N2 - The bias in atmospheric variables and that in model computation are two major causes of failures in discharge estimation. Attributing the bias in discharge estimation becomes difficult if the forcing bias cannot be evaluated and excluded in advance in places lacking qualified meteorological observations, especially in cold and mountainous areas (e.g., the upper Tarim Basin). In this study, we proposed an Organizing Carbon and Hydrology In Dynamic EcosystEms (ORCHIDEE)-Budyko framework which helps identify the bias range from the two sources (i.e., forcing and model structure) with a set of analytical approaches. The latest version of the land surface model ORCHIDEE was used to provide reliable discharge simulations based on the most improved forcing inputs. The Budyko approach was then introduced to attribute the discharge bias to two sources with prescribed assumptions. Results show that, as the forcing biases, the water inputs (rainfall, snowfall or glacier melt) are very likely underestimated for the Tarim headwater catchments span classCombining double low lineinline-formula 43.2 span % to 21.0%). Meanwhile, the potential evapotranspiration is unrealistically high over the upper Yarkand and the upper Hotan River (1240.4 and 1153.7mmyrspan classCombining double low lineinline-formula g'1/span , respectively). Determined by the model structure, the bias in actual evapotranspiration is possible but not the only contributor to the discharge underestimation (overestimated by up to 105.8% for the upper Aksu River). Based on a simple scaling approach, we estimated the water consumption by human intervention ranging from span classCombining double low lineinline-formula 213.50×108/span to span classCombining double low lineinline-formula 300.58×108/span mspan classCombining double low lineinline-formula/span yrspan classCombining double low lineinline-formula g'1/span at the Alar gauge station, which is another bias source in the current version of ORCHIDEE. This study succeeded in retrospecting the bias from the discharge estimation to multiple bias sources of the atmospheric variables and the model structure. The framework provides a unique method for evaluating the regional water cycle and its biases with our current knowledge of observational uncertainties.

AB - The bias in atmospheric variables and that in model computation are two major causes of failures in discharge estimation. Attributing the bias in discharge estimation becomes difficult if the forcing bias cannot be evaluated and excluded in advance in places lacking qualified meteorological observations, especially in cold and mountainous areas (e.g., the upper Tarim Basin). In this study, we proposed an Organizing Carbon and Hydrology In Dynamic EcosystEms (ORCHIDEE)-Budyko framework which helps identify the bias range from the two sources (i.e., forcing and model structure) with a set of analytical approaches. The latest version of the land surface model ORCHIDEE was used to provide reliable discharge simulations based on the most improved forcing inputs. The Budyko approach was then introduced to attribute the discharge bias to two sources with prescribed assumptions. Results show that, as the forcing biases, the water inputs (rainfall, snowfall or glacier melt) are very likely underestimated for the Tarim headwater catchments span classCombining double low lineinline-formula 43.2 span % to 21.0%). Meanwhile, the potential evapotranspiration is unrealistically high over the upper Yarkand and the upper Hotan River (1240.4 and 1153.7mmyrspan classCombining double low lineinline-formula g'1/span , respectively). Determined by the model structure, the bias in actual evapotranspiration is possible but not the only contributor to the discharge underestimation (overestimated by up to 105.8% for the upper Aksu River). Based on a simple scaling approach, we estimated the water consumption by human intervention ranging from span classCombining double low lineinline-formula 213.50×108/span to span classCombining double low lineinline-formula 300.58×108/span mspan classCombining double low lineinline-formula/span yrspan classCombining double low lineinline-formula g'1/span at the Alar gauge station, which is another bias source in the current version of ORCHIDEE. This study succeeded in retrospecting the bias from the discharge estimation to multiple bias sources of the atmospheric variables and the model structure. The framework provides a unique method for evaluating the regional water cycle and its biases with our current knowledge of observational uncertainties.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057821243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057821243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5194/hess-22-6087-2018

DO - 10.5194/hess-22-6087-2018

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 6087

EP - 6108

JO - Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

JF - Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

SN - 1027-5606

IS - 11

ER -