Unintended effects of caring: 2×2 symmetric game structure transformations through various mutual caring

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to clarify social effects of mutual caring, by using game theory. We treat only 2×2 symmetric games that are twelve types in all. We define "way of caring" by "altruistic" and "egalitarian" parameters. We pick up thirteen ways of caring, for example altruism, competition, egalitarianism etc. Caring about the other transforms objective payoff structure into subjective payoff structure. As a result of analyzing this transformation we obtain following findings. (1) Almost all the payoff-structures can be transformed into all the payoff-structures in 2×2 symmetric games by changing the values of "altruistic" and "egalitarian" parameters. (2) It depends on game type whether a way of caring causes Pareto-inefficiency or not. For example, "poor loser" in other words the anti-altruistic and egalitarian causes Pareto-inefficiency in prisoners' dilemmas and chicken games. (3) The most frequent about causing Pareto-inefficiency are "competition" and "sacrifice" (7 games in 12 games). The second most frequent is "anti-egalitarianism" (6 games). On the other hand "egalitarianism" is less frequent (2 games), so that "egalitarianism" is good not only in equality but also in Pareto-efficiency. In fact both "egoism" and " altruism" are least frequent (1 game) except "maxmin", "maxmax", and "sum-ranking" (0 games). We clarify the ranking of "ways of caring" about causing Pareto-inefficiency in 2×2 symmetric games.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-76
Number of pages6
JournalSociological Theory and Methods
Volume22
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

egalitarianism
altruism
ranking
egoism
cause
game theory
prisoner
social effects
equality
efficiency
Values

Keywords

  • Caring about others
  • Mutuality
  • Prisoners' dilemmas

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{becdf95bedab430a81b157b6b50fec50,
title = "Unintended effects of caring: 2×2 symmetric game structure transformations through various mutual caring",
abstract = "The purpose of this paper is to clarify social effects of mutual caring, by using game theory. We treat only 2×2 symmetric games that are twelve types in all. We define {"}way of caring{"} by {"}altruistic{"} and {"}egalitarian{"} parameters. We pick up thirteen ways of caring, for example altruism, competition, egalitarianism etc. Caring about the other transforms objective payoff structure into subjective payoff structure. As a result of analyzing this transformation we obtain following findings. (1) Almost all the payoff-structures can be transformed into all the payoff-structures in 2×2 symmetric games by changing the values of {"}altruistic{"} and {"}egalitarian{"} parameters. (2) It depends on game type whether a way of caring causes Pareto-inefficiency or not. For example, {"}poor loser{"} in other words the anti-altruistic and egalitarian causes Pareto-inefficiency in prisoners' dilemmas and chicken games. (3) The most frequent about causing Pareto-inefficiency are {"}competition{"} and {"}sacrifice{"} (7 games in 12 games). The second most frequent is {"}anti-egalitarianism{"} (6 games). On the other hand {"}egalitarianism{"} is less frequent (2 games), so that {"}egalitarianism{"} is good not only in equality but also in Pareto-efficiency. In fact both {"}egoism{"} and {"} altruism{"} are least frequent (1 game) except {"}maxmin{"}, {"}maxmax{"}, and {"}sum-ranking{"} (0 games). We clarify the ranking of {"}ways of caring{"} about causing Pareto-inefficiency in 2×2 symmetric games.",
keywords = "Caring about others, Mutuality, Prisoners' dilemmas",
author = "Masayoshi Muto",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "71--76",
journal = "Sociological Theory and Methods",
issn = "0913-1442",
publisher = "Japanese Association for Mathematical Sociology",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unintended effects of caring

T2 - 2×2 symmetric game structure transformations through various mutual caring

AU - Muto, Masayoshi

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The purpose of this paper is to clarify social effects of mutual caring, by using game theory. We treat only 2×2 symmetric games that are twelve types in all. We define "way of caring" by "altruistic" and "egalitarian" parameters. We pick up thirteen ways of caring, for example altruism, competition, egalitarianism etc. Caring about the other transforms objective payoff structure into subjective payoff structure. As a result of analyzing this transformation we obtain following findings. (1) Almost all the payoff-structures can be transformed into all the payoff-structures in 2×2 symmetric games by changing the values of "altruistic" and "egalitarian" parameters. (2) It depends on game type whether a way of caring causes Pareto-inefficiency or not. For example, "poor loser" in other words the anti-altruistic and egalitarian causes Pareto-inefficiency in prisoners' dilemmas and chicken games. (3) The most frequent about causing Pareto-inefficiency are "competition" and "sacrifice" (7 games in 12 games). The second most frequent is "anti-egalitarianism" (6 games). On the other hand "egalitarianism" is less frequent (2 games), so that "egalitarianism" is good not only in equality but also in Pareto-efficiency. In fact both "egoism" and " altruism" are least frequent (1 game) except "maxmin", "maxmax", and "sum-ranking" (0 games). We clarify the ranking of "ways of caring" about causing Pareto-inefficiency in 2×2 symmetric games.

AB - The purpose of this paper is to clarify social effects of mutual caring, by using game theory. We treat only 2×2 symmetric games that are twelve types in all. We define "way of caring" by "altruistic" and "egalitarian" parameters. We pick up thirteen ways of caring, for example altruism, competition, egalitarianism etc. Caring about the other transforms objective payoff structure into subjective payoff structure. As a result of analyzing this transformation we obtain following findings. (1) Almost all the payoff-structures can be transformed into all the payoff-structures in 2×2 symmetric games by changing the values of "altruistic" and "egalitarian" parameters. (2) It depends on game type whether a way of caring causes Pareto-inefficiency or not. For example, "poor loser" in other words the anti-altruistic and egalitarian causes Pareto-inefficiency in prisoners' dilemmas and chicken games. (3) The most frequent about causing Pareto-inefficiency are "competition" and "sacrifice" (7 games in 12 games). The second most frequent is "anti-egalitarianism" (6 games). On the other hand "egalitarianism" is less frequent (2 games), so that "egalitarianism" is good not only in equality but also in Pareto-efficiency. In fact both "egoism" and " altruism" are least frequent (1 game) except "maxmin", "maxmax", and "sum-ranking" (0 games). We clarify the ranking of "ways of caring" about causing Pareto-inefficiency in 2×2 symmetric games.

KW - Caring about others

KW - Mutuality

KW - Prisoners' dilemmas

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548159060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548159060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34548159060

VL - 22

SP - 71

EP - 76

JO - Sociological Theory and Methods

JF - Sociological Theory and Methods

SN - 0913-1442

IS - 1

ER -