抄録
In this research, the model to quantify various environmental & social benefits comprehensively expected by governmental countermeasures execution was developed as a reasonable method of policy decision making on domestic livestock manure oversupply problem. The developed model was applied to Maebashi city, Gunma Prefecture as a case study. The model consists of "Sub-model for Agricultural Material Flow Analysis" considering Life Cycle Assessment and "Sub-Model for Characterization of Environmental & Social Benefits". The output of this model showed the cost-benefit ratio of proposed countermeasures. As the items of benefits, these 8 categories were chosen by panel method: water pollution, soil pollution, air pollution, global warming, acidification, protection of exhaustible resource, food self-sufficiency ratio and energy self-sufficiency ratio. As a result, "Compost use promotion" plan and "Feed production support" plan showed a large costbenefit ratio in some categories (not all). However, both measures had upper limits of possible budget distribution by model constraints. Therefore, it was suggested that the combination of countermeasures would be necessary in terms of both reasonable budget distribution and diversity of expected benefits. The result would contribute to the construction of the reasonable decision making method.
| 元の言語 | English |
|---|---|
| ページ（範囲） | 719-730 |
| ページ数 | 12 |
| ジャーナル | Nihon Enerugi Gakkaishi/Journal of the Japan Institute of Energy |
| 巻 | 87 |
| 発行部数 | 9 |
| DOI | |
| 出版物ステータス | Published - 2008 9 |
| 外部発表 | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Energy(all)
これを引用
Model development for evaluating countermeasures effects against livestock manure management (study on reasonable budget planning for effective utilization of livestock manure). / Iwata, Tomoko; Shimada, Sohei.
：: Nihon Enerugi Gakkaishi/Journal of the Japan Institute of Energy, 巻 87, 番号 9, 09.2008, p. 719-730.研究成果: Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Model development for evaluating countermeasures effects against livestock manure management (study on reasonable budget planning for effective utilization of livestock manure)
AU - Iwata, Tomoko
AU - Shimada, Sohei
PY - 2008/9
Y1 - 2008/9
N2 - In this research, the model to quantify various environmental & social benefits comprehensively expected by governmental countermeasures execution was developed as a reasonable method of policy decision making on domestic livestock manure oversupply problem. The developed model was applied to Maebashi city, Gunma Prefecture as a case study. The model consists of "Sub-model for Agricultural Material Flow Analysis" considering Life Cycle Assessment and "Sub-Model for Characterization of Environmental & Social Benefits". The output of this model showed the cost-benefit ratio of proposed countermeasures. As the items of benefits, these 8 categories were chosen by panel method: water pollution, soil pollution, air pollution, global warming, acidification, protection of exhaustible resource, food self-sufficiency ratio and energy self-sufficiency ratio. As a result, "Compost use promotion" plan and "Feed production support" plan showed a large costbenefit ratio in some categories (not all). However, both measures had upper limits of possible budget distribution by model constraints. Therefore, it was suggested that the combination of countermeasures would be necessary in terms of both reasonable budget distribution and diversity of expected benefits. The result would contribute to the construction of the reasonable decision making method.
AB - In this research, the model to quantify various environmental & social benefits comprehensively expected by governmental countermeasures execution was developed as a reasonable method of policy decision making on domestic livestock manure oversupply problem. The developed model was applied to Maebashi city, Gunma Prefecture as a case study. The model consists of "Sub-model for Agricultural Material Flow Analysis" considering Life Cycle Assessment and "Sub-Model for Characterization of Environmental & Social Benefits". The output of this model showed the cost-benefit ratio of proposed countermeasures. As the items of benefits, these 8 categories were chosen by panel method: water pollution, soil pollution, air pollution, global warming, acidification, protection of exhaustible resource, food self-sufficiency ratio and energy self-sufficiency ratio. As a result, "Compost use promotion" plan and "Feed production support" plan showed a large costbenefit ratio in some categories (not all). However, both measures had upper limits of possible budget distribution by model constraints. Therefore, it was suggested that the combination of countermeasures would be necessary in terms of both reasonable budget distribution and diversity of expected benefits. The result would contribute to the construction of the reasonable decision making method.
KW - Budget distribution
KW - Decision making
KW - Lifecycle impact assessment
KW - Livestock manure
KW - Model simulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56549086296&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56549086296&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3775/jie.87.719
DO - 10.3775/jie.87.719
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:56549086296
VL - 87
SP - 719
EP - 730
JO - Nenryo Kyokai-Shi/Journal of the Fuel Society of Japan
JF - Nenryo Kyokai-Shi/Journal of the Fuel Society of Japan
SN - 0916-8753
IS - 9
ER -